Is there an existing issue for this?
Current Behavior
Specification 1.0 for SchnorrProof (p 10, p 27) has the challenge as
c i,j = H(Q, K i,j , h i,j )
But implementation make_schnorr_proof in schnorr.py. line 89 has
c = hash_elems(k, h)
This was discussed in
Election-Tech-Initiative/electionguard-python#278
and it was decided to leave out the Q.
Expected Behavior
The specification should be amended after reviewing the decision to leave out the Q.
Steps To Reproduce
No response
Environment
Anything else?
The 2.0 document being circulated "Proofs in ElectionGuard– changes for version 2.0" section 2 should also be amended.
Is there an existing issue for this?
Current Behavior
Specification 1.0 for SchnorrProof (p 10, p 27) has the challenge as
c i,j = H(Q, K i,j , h i,j )But implementation make_schnorr_proof in schnorr.py. line 89 has
c = hash_elems(k, h)This was discussed in
Election-Tech-Initiative/electionguard-python#278
and it was decided to leave out the Q.
Expected Behavior
The specification should be amended after reviewing the decision to leave out the Q.
Steps To Reproduce
No response
Environment
- OS:Anything else?
The 2.0 document being circulated "Proofs in ElectionGuard– changes for version 2.0" section 2 should also be amended.