Skip to content

design question: mvn support seems to be complicated #707

@lispnik

Description

@lispnik

From some debugging in #706 the mvn/aether code attempts to use already installed Maven and depending on its version, call different things.

I don't think ABCL should do that.

The mvn support in ABCL should bootstrap itself with a specific version of Maven and just use that rather than whatever is going on in $M2_HOME etc. This seems to be what tools such as leiningen do (via pomegranate – a wrapper for eclipse/maven aerther).

Thoughts on improving the ABCL maven support by bootstrapping with a specific version included?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions