Skip to content

Blogpost eessi musica#723

Open
adammccartney wants to merge 6 commits intoEESSI:mainfrom
adammccartney:blogpost-eessi-musica
Open

Blogpost eessi musica#723
adammccartney wants to merge 6 commits intoEESSI:mainfrom
adammccartney:blogpost-eessi-musica

Conversation

@adammccartney
Copy link
Copy Markdown

I wrote this after our initial experiments with Easybuild and EESSI back in the Spring of 2025.
Edited recently, kept most of the same points and tried to summarize a bit as to why we eventually chose EESSI as a basis for the new software stack on MUSICA at ASC.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@adammccartney Looks really nice, found some small issues that can easily be tackled with minimal effort, so let's fix those and then publish?

computing and research powered by scientific software. The flagship
cluster VSC-1 was in service from 2009-2015, succeeded by a series of
clusters (2-5)[^1]. VSC 4 and 5 are the two clusters that remain in
service as of 2025, they will be joined at the end of the year by a new
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@adammccartney Nitpicking, but this part doesn't make sense for a blog post published in March 2026?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree, it's probably still relevant, but the dates need to be brought up to date.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

out against a set of high level user requirements that we agreed.
Outcome was to focus on Easybuild and EESSI.

+ Winter 2024 - Spring 2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
+ Winter 2024 - Spring 2025
+ *Winter 2024 - Spring 2025*:


+ Autumn 2024
Working group established and a broad set of tools and approaches were
compared. Guix/Nix, Spack, EasyBuild, EESSI, Lmod, and ReFrame These
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
compared. Guix/Nix, Spack, EasyBuild, EESSI, Lmod, and ReFrame These
compared. Guix/Nix, Spack, EasyBuild, EESSI, Lmod, and ReFrame. These

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, I'm not sure how ReFrame makes sense in this list, since that's a tool for software regression testing?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approaches - "EESSI on the side" vs. "EESSI as a base"


In June 2024, the system entered a closed test phase, with core software
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like this should be 2025?

Suggested change
In June 2024, the system entered a closed test phase, with core software
In June 2025, the system entered a closed test phase, with core software

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I'll actually add two more small sections here that cover the closed and open test phases.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

adammccartney and others added 3 commits April 1, 2026 09:41
Co-authored-by: Kenneth Hoste <kenneth.hoste@ugent.be>
Co-authored-by: Kenneth Hoste <kenneth.hoste@ugent.be>
@adammccartney
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

The spellchecker looks like it's not aware of the Austrian city Linz

@adammccartney adammccartney requested a review from boegel April 1, 2026 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants