[2026-03 LWG Motion 11] P3986R1 A Wording Strategy for Inlinable Receivers#8915
Open
jensmaurer wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Open
[2026-03 LWG Motion 11] P3986R1 A Wording Strategy for Inlinable Receivers#8915jensmaurer wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
jensmaurer wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Member
|
Missing |
eisenwave
suggested changes
Apr 4, 2026
Member
eisenwave
left a comment
eisenwave
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm surprised that check-output.sh doesn't already catch the missing \libconcepts here.
| if the lifetimes of all objects transitively constructed from | ||
| \tcode{rcvr} during the evaluation of $E$ | ||
| end within the evaluation of $E$. | ||
|
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should there really be an empty line here if the note is attached to the previous paragraph?
| \pnum | ||
| Let \tcode{StdRcvr} be a receiver type defined by this document. | ||
| Given some operation state type \tcode{Op}, | ||
| it is unspecified whether \tcode{StdRcvr} models \tcode{inlinable_receiver<Op>}. |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| it is unspecified whether \tcode{StdRcvr} models \tcode{inlinable_receiver<Op>}. | |
| it is unspecified whether \tcode{StdRcvr} models \tcode{\libconcept{inlinable_receiver}<Op>}. |
| Let \tcode{StdOp} be some operation state type defined by this document and | ||
| let \tcode{Sndr} and \tcode{Rcvr} be types such that | ||
| \tcode{is_same_v<connect_result_t<Sndr, Rcvr>, StdOp>} is \tcode{true}. | ||
| If \tcode{Rcvr} models \tcode{inlinable_receiver<StdOp>} |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| If \tcode{Rcvr} models \tcode{inlinable_receiver<StdOp>} | |
| If \tcode{Rcvr} models \tcode{\libconcept{inlinable_receiver}<StdOp>} |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #8845
Also fixes cplusplus/papers#2688
Also fixes cplusplus/nbballot#893