deps: update V8 to 14.6 by targos · Pull Request #61898 · nodejs/node

targos · 2026-02-20T11:02:38Z

PR for previous version: #61681

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-02-20T11:02:43Z

Review requested:

@nodejs/gyp
@nodejs/security-wg
@nodejs/v8-update

targos · 2026-02-20T11:04:00Z

Compared to version 14.5, there is a new test failure that is not obvious. Local run:

=== release test-repl-mode ===                                                
Path: parallel/test-repl-mode
node:internal/assert/utils:146
  throw error;
  ^

AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: The input did not match the regular expression /ReferenceError: x is not defined/. Input:

'> 3\n> '

    at testStrictMode (/home/targos/git/nodejs/v8-next-update/test/parallel/test-repl-mode.js:38:10)
    at /home/targos/git/nodejs/v8-next-update/test/parallel/test-repl-mode.js:18:3
    at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)
    at Object.<anonymous> (/home/targos/git/nodejs/v8-next-update/test/parallel/test-repl-mode.js:17:7)
    at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1811:14)
    at Object..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1951:10)
    at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1532:32)
    at Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1334:12)
    at wrapModuleLoad (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:255:19)
    at Module.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (node:internal/modules/run_main:154:5) {
  generatedMessage: true,
  code: 'ERR_ASSERTION',
  actual: '> 3\n> ',
  expected: /ReferenceError: x is not defined/,
  operator: 'match',
  diff: 'simple'
}

Node.js v26.0.0-pre
Command: out/Release/node /home/targos/git/nodejs/v8-next-update/test/parallel/test-repl-mode.js

targos · 2026-02-20T13:46:29Z

Additionally, snapshot is no longer reproducible:

Edit: not macOS-specific: https://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/22221811293/job/64279253109

=== release test-snapshot-reproducible ===
Path: parallel/test-snapshot-reproducible
Error: --- stderr ---
node:internal/assert/utils:146
  throw error;
  ^

AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Expected values to be strictly deep-equal:
+ actual - expected
... Skipped lines

  [
    '#include <cstddef>',
    '#include "env.h"',
    '#include "node_snapshot_builder.h"',
    '#include "v8.h"',
...
    'namespace node {',
+   'static const char v8_snapshot_blob_data[] = {4,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,3,126,58,75,100,19,-88,-44,49,52,46,54,46,50,48,50,46,52,45,110,111,100,101,46,54,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,  // 0',
-   'static const char v8_snapshot_blob_data[] = {4,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,-72,125,-78,63,100,19,-88,-44,49,52,46,54,46,50,48,50,46,52,45,110,111,100,101,46,54,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,  // 0',
    '0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,32,-95,18,0,40,-48,24,0,104,-6,28,0,-48,-8,29,0,-24,-11,30,0,-48,-15,31,0,-88,6,-34,-64,-80,-96,18,0,-95,24,96,0,0,0,0,83,0,0,0,96,0,0,0,0,  // 1',
    '0,0,0,0,96,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,96,0,0,0,0,-61,1,0,0,96,0,0,0,0,60,0,0,0,96,0,0,0,0,-28,1,0,0,96,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,96,0,0,0,0,36,1,0,0,11,5,24,-30,-1,1,  // 2',
    '5,24,-94,0,2,5,24,98,1,2,5,24,34,2,2,5,24,-30,2,2,5,24,-94,3,2,5,24,98,4,2,5,24,34,5,2,5,24,-30,5,2,5,24,-94,6,2,5,24,98,7,2,5,24,34,8,2,5,24,-30,8,2,1,76,7,101,  // 3',
    '15,69,64,97,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,64,98,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,64,96,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,7,-123,2,64,96,0,0,0,  // 4',
    '0,8,0,0,0,-127,0,91,64,1,20,83,69,97,0,0,0,0,96,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,93,1,20,83,69,97,0,0,0,0,96,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,93,1,20,83,69,97,0,0,0,0,96,0,  // 5',
...
    '0,0,0,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-124,0,7,33,10,1,28,-108,-128,27,31,16,5,24,-94,-65,2,6,77,31,4,-67,52,1,12,7,29,1,64,32,109,18,96,  // 34655',
+   '0,0,0,0,0,2,0,0,7,13,13,1,28,4,40,-128,27,31,20,5,24,-94,-65,2,6,81,31,-109,1,12,-108,64,32,113,18,96,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,91,96,0,0,0,0,-45,31,0,0,1,28,4,33,53,1,-128,-111,102,0,  // 34656',
-   '0,0,0,0,0,2,0,0,7,13,13,1,28,4,40,-128,27,31,20,5,24,-94,-65,2,6,81,31,-109,1,12,-108,64,32,113,18,96,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,91,96,0,0,0,0,-122,33,0,0,1,28,4,33,53,1,-128,-111,102,0,  // 34656',
    '0,0,0,30,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,8,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-115,0,9,53,8,1,12,7,1,  // 34657',
    '15,1,28,-106,-128,27,32,4,6,5,1,1,40,4,92,96,0,0,0,0,8,0,0,0,6,9,1,4,100,1,28,-106,-128,27,31,8,5,24,-94,-65,2,6,85,31,-109,1,12,-108,64,32,117,18,9,-107,2,1,32,4,-124,-128,27,32,81,15,  // 34658',
    '6,-31,27,4,61,59,4,29,47,65,1,28,-106,-128,27,32,85,15,6,-27,27,-108,4,37,47,64,1,28,4,40,-128,27,32,89,15,6,-23,27,-108,4,45,47,4,49,47,66,96,0,0,0,0,1,3,0,0,71,7,117,16,96,0,0,0,0,  // 34659',
    '13,2,0,0,72,7,121,16,96,0,0,0,0,13,1,0,0,91,32,93,15,6,-19,27,-108,4,53,47,1,28,-105,-128,27,31,8,5,24,-94,-65,2,6,89,31,4,-67,52,1,12,7,29,1,64,32,121,18,1,32,4,-124,-128,27,31,20,5,  // 34660',
    '24,-94,-65,2,6,93,31,-107,1,12,-106,64,32,125,18,65,1,32,-105,-128,27,31,12,5,24,-94,-65,2,6,97,31,-107,1,12,-106,64,32,-127,18,65,1,32,-105,-128,27,31,16,5,24,-94,-65,2,6,101,31,-107,1,12,-106,64,32,-123,18,65,  // 34661',

    at Object.<anonymous> (/Users/runner/work/node/node/node/test/parallel/test-snapshot-reproducible.js:47:8)
    at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1811:14)
    at Object..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1951:10)
    at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1532:32)
    at Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1334:12)
    at wrapModuleLoad (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:255:19)
    at Module.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (node:internal/modules/run_main:154:5)
    at node:internal/main/run_main_module:33:47 {
  generatedMessage: true,
  code: 'ERR_ASSERTION',
  actual: [
    '#include <cstddef>',
    '#include "env.h"',
    '#include "node_snapshot_builder.h"',
    '#include "v8.h"',
    '',
    '// This file is generated by tools/snapshot. Do not edit.',
    '',
    'namespace node {',
    'static const char v8_snapshot_blob_data[] = {4,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,3,126,58,75,100,19,-88

Renegade334 · 2026-02-21T13:48:21Z

Note that this changeset does not compile with GCC <14.1, unless the following patch is applied:

diff --git a/deps/v8/src/objects/js-duration-format.cc b/deps/v8/src/objects/js-duration-format.cc
index 41bdbc2cc6..c9ef451713 100644
--- a/deps/v8/src/objects/js-duration-format.cc
+++ b/deps/v8/src/objects/js-duration-format.cc
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ void OutputFractional(const char* type, int64_t integer, int32_t powerOfTen,
   // Pass in the value as int64_t and ask ICU to scale down.
   nfOpts = nfOpts.scale(icu::number::Scale::powerOfTen(-powerOfTen));

-  int64_t factor = static_cast<int64_t>(std::powl(10, powerOfTen));
+  int64_t factor = static_cast<int64_t>(std::pow(10.0L, powerOfTen));
   int64_t bound = std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max() / factor - 1;
   UErrorCode status = U_ZERO_ERROR;
   // Use faster ICU API formatInt if the value fit the precision int64_t,

sxa · 2026-02-22T22:04:58Z

Additionally, snapshot is no longer reproducible:

FYI @joyeecheung

sxa · 2026-02-22T22:06:07Z

For what it's worth this branch seems to build ok with a RISC-V cross compiler too 👍🏻 (An experimental platform but I thought I'd mention it anyway ;-) )

targos · 2026-03-13T14:51:08Z

@nodejs/platform-windows Can you please have a look at the Windows build failure?

targos · 2026-03-13T15:54:32Z

There's still this REPL strict mode issue: #61898 (comment)

@nodejs/repl

targos · 2026-03-13T15:55:25Z

And the reproducible snapshot: #61898 (comment)

@nodejs/startup (for lack of a more specific team)

Renegade334 · 2026-03-13T16:19:59Z

There's still this REPL strict mode issue: #61898 (comment)

It's not so much a REPL issue as an issue with the VM global sandbox interceptors, introduced as a regression with 113b5cf. Previously, we were simulating CheckContextualStoreToJSGlobalObject-esque behaviour by rejecting interceptions on global proxy properties in strict mode if the receiver was not the global object. Now that we can no longer observe the receiver, that mechanism doesn't exist, and statements like nonExistantGlobalVariable = 42 are setting a property on the global sandbox instead of throwing in strict mode.

(We should probably have VM tests for this.)

Renegade334 · 2026-03-13T16:21:22Z

Note that this changeset does not compile with GCC <14.1, unless the following patch is applied:

diff --git a/deps/v8/src/objects/js-duration-format.cc b/deps/v8/src/objects/js-duration-format.cc
index 41bdbc2cc6..c9ef451713 100644
--- a/deps/v8/src/objects/js-duration-format.cc
+++ b/deps/v8/src/objects/js-duration-format.cc
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ void OutputFractional(const char* type, int64_t integer, int32_t powerOfTen,
   // Pass in the value as int64_t and ask ICU to scale down.
   nfOpts = nfOpts.scale(icu::number::Scale::powerOfTen(-powerOfTen));

-  int64_t factor = static_cast<int64_t>(std::powl(10, powerOfTen));
+  int64_t factor = static_cast<int64_t>(std::pow(10.0L, powerOfTen));
   int64_t bound = std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max() / factor - 1;
   UErrorCode status = U_ZERO_ERROR;
   // Use faster ICU API formatInt if the value fit the precision int64_t,

We will either need to merge (or upstream) this, or change the GCC build requirement to >=14.1.

targos · 2026-03-13T16:22:41Z

Would you like to try and upstream it?

Renegade334 · 2026-03-13T16:27:52Z

It would be easier if someone with existing Chromium contributor status did the honours, I'd rather not jump through the hoops for a one-liner!

joyeecheung · 2026-03-14T03:19:39Z

Locally this fixes the snapshot reproducibility test for me

See diff

diff --git a/deps/v8/src/builtins/builtins-proxy-gen.cc b/deps/v8/src/builtins/builtins-proxy-gen.cc
index 0bc45bac300..f0047f044f2 100644
--- a/deps/v8/src/builtins/builtins-proxy-gen.cc
+++ b/deps/v8/src/builtins/builtins-proxy-gen.cc
@@ -63,6 +63,10 @@ TNode<JSProxy> ProxiesCodeStubAssembler::AllocateProxy(
   StoreObjectFieldNoWriteBarrier(proxy, JSProxy::kTargetOffset, target);
   StoreObjectFieldNoWriteBarrier(proxy, JSProxy::kHandlerOffset, handler);
   StoreObjectFieldNoWriteBarrier(proxy, JSProxy::kFlagsOffset, flags);
+#if TAGGED_SIZE_8_BYTES
+  StoreObjectFieldNoWriteBarrier(proxy, JSProxy::kPaddingOffset,
+                                 Int32Constant(0));
+#endif
 
   return CAST(proxy);
 }
diff --git a/deps/v8/src/heap/factory.cc b/deps/v8/src/heap/factory.cc
index b6f6938450c..e0117df19f9 100644
--- a/deps/v8/src/heap/factory.cc
+++ b/deps/v8/src/heap/factory.cc
@@ -3945,6 +3945,9 @@ Handle<JSProxy> Factory::NewJSProxy(DirectHandle<JSReceiver> target,
   result->set_target(*target, SKIP_WRITE_BARRIER);
   result->set_handler(*handler, SKIP_WRITE_BARRIER);
   result->set_flags(JSProxy::IsRevocableBit::encode(revocable));
+#if TAGGED_SIZE_8_BYTES
+  result->set_padding(0);
+#endif
   return handle(result, isolate());
 }

Uploaded https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/7666243

joyeecheung · 2026-03-14T04:21:34Z

It would be easier if someone with existing Chromium contributor status did the honours, I'd rather not jump through the hoops for a one-liner!

Also uploaded https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/7666244 (IIUC, it was a libstdc++ issue fixed by https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2023-February/055493.html)

StefanStojanovic · 2026-03-16T12:43:04Z

@nodejs/platform-windows Can you please have a look at the Windows build failure?

I'll take a look. Thanks for the ping.

StefanStojanovic · 2026-03-16T16:54:08Z

@nodejs/platform-windows Can you please have a look at the Windows build failure?

Will look into it. Thanks for the ping.

So that snapshots with proxies can be reproducible. Refs: nodejs/node#61898 Change-Id: I01fac5e18c73cd482a1ae63750dbadf42a12e08a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/7666243 Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#105830}

StefanStojanovic · 2026-03-17T09:46:58Z

@targos, here is the patch to enable building on Windows: v8-146-fix.patch. Two small changes were needed.

Original commit message: Zero-initialize proxy padding So that snapshots with proxies can be reproducible. Refs: nodejs#61898 Change-Id: I01fac5e18c73cd482a1ae63750dbadf42a12e08a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/7666243 Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#105830} Refs: v8/v8@edeb0a4

targos · 2026-03-17T10:46:42Z

Thanks @StefanStojanovic and @joyeecheung. I pushed your fixes. Let's see how it goes on GH runners.

Use the method without context parameter; the old API is deprecated. Refs: https://crrev.com/c/7141498

Use the new API which gets a `ModuleCachingCallback` parameter. Refs: https://crrev.com/c/7078551

Refs: nodejs#60616

Refs: nodejs/node#61898 (comment)

targos · 2026-04-03T07:56:21Z

I opened nodejs/build#4290 to skip smartos22
nodejs/build#4286 is the other blocker

So we're waiting for these to get a green CI, but this PR is now ready!

/cc @nodejs/v8-update @nodejs/tsc

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-04-03T08:57:10Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/72443/

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-04-03T08:57:29Z

V8 CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-v8-linux/nodes=benchmark-ubuntu2404-intel-64,v8test=v8test/7099/

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-04-03T08:57:50Z

V8 CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-v8-linux/nodes=rhel8-power9le,v8test=v8test/7099/

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-04-03T08:57:52Z

V8 CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-v8-linux/nodes=rhel8-s390x,v8test=v8test/7099/

Original commit message: [runtime] always sort transition arrays during rehashing After rehashing, the arrays are no longer in hash-sorted order. In this case, we need to force a re-sort even for small arrays, so that subsequent linear searches can find the correct transition and avoid inserting duplicates. Refs: nodejs#61898 (comment) Change-Id: Ia813d1fb9d23e08012811d672052d235c0e0bf4d Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/7723678 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#106255} Refs: v8/v8@00f6e83

targos · 2026-04-03T10:26:46Z

Needs a new change after #59034

Error: Found 4 unexpected passes. Consider updating test/wpt/status/wasm/jsapi.json for these files:
memory/to-fixed-length-buffer-shared.any.js
memory/to-fixed-length-buffer.any.js
memory/to-resizable-buffer-shared.any.js
memory/to-resizable-buffer.any.js
    at process.<anonymous> (/home/runner/work/node/node/node/test/common/wpt.js:813:15)
    at process.emit (node:events:509:20)

Node.js v26.0.0-pre

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-04-03T12:31:13Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/72450/

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-04-03T12:31:28Z

V8 CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-v8-linux/nodes=benchmark-ubuntu2404-intel-64,v8test=v8test/7102/

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-04-03T12:31:48Z

V8 CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-v8-linux/nodes=rhel8-power9le,v8test=v8test/7102/

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-04-03T12:31:49Z

V8 CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-v8-linux/nodes=rhel8-s390x,v8test=v8test/7102/

nodejs-github-bot added build Issues and PRs related to build files or the CI. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. v8 engine Issues and PRs related to the V8 dependency. labels Feb 20, 2026

This was referenced Feb 20, 2026

deps: update V8 to 14.4 #61002

Closed

deps: update V8 to 14.5 #61681

Closed

targos added the semver-major PRs that contain breaking changes and should be released in the next major version. label Feb 20, 2026

targos force-pushed the v8-146 branch from 1e241d1 to 25c85aa Compare February 20, 2026 11:10

targos added the help wanted Issues that need assistance from volunteers or PRs that need help to proceed. label Feb 20, 2026

targos force-pushed the v8-146 branch from 25c85aa to c63c70d Compare March 13, 2026 14:08

backes and others added 8 commits April 3, 2026 09:51

src: avoid deprecated FixedArray::Get

34cce3d

Use the method without context parameter; the old API is deprecated. Refs: https://crrev.com/c/7141498

src: avoid deprecated Wasm API

ecc59a9

Use the new API which gets a `ModuleCachingCallback` parameter. Refs: https://crrev.com/c/7078551

src: stop using v8::PropertyCallbackInfo<T>::This()

46fbbf9

Refs: nodejs#60616

src: replace uses of deprecated v8::External APIs

ed5ab5d

test: add type tags to uses of v8::External

f72a301

test: support presence of Temporal global

c11b49e

tools: remove v8_initializers_slow workaround from v8.gyp

62ff0ab

build: enable V8_VERIFY_WRITE_BARRIERS in debug build

766cc58

targos force-pushed the v8-146 branch from c851481 to 766cc58 Compare April 3, 2026 07:51

targos added a commit to targos/nodejs-build that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2026

jenkins: skip smartos22 for Node.js >=26

f420731

Refs: nodejs/node#61898 (comment)

targos mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2026

jenkins: skip smartos22 for Node.js >=26 nodejs/build#4290

Open

targos removed request-ci-failed An error occurred while starting CI via request-ci label, and manual interventon is needed. help wanted Issues that need assistance from volunteers or PRs that need help to proceed. labels Apr 3, 2026

aduh95 approved these changes Apr 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

aduh95 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 3, 2026

github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 3, 2026

Renegade334 mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2026

test: check contextify contextual store behavior in strict mode #62571

Open

targos mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2026

deps: update V8 to 14.8 #62572

Open

test: update wpt Wasm jsapi expectations

4534bc6

Uh oh!

Conversation

targos commented Feb 20, 2026

Uh oh!

nodejs-github-bot commented Feb 20, 2026

Uh oh!

targos commented Feb 20, 2026

Uh oh!

targos commented Feb 20, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Renegade334 commented Feb 21, 2026

Uh oh!

sxa commented Feb 22, 2026

Uh oh!

sxa commented Feb 22, 2026

Uh oh!

targos commented Mar 13, 2026

Uh oh!

targos commented Mar 13, 2026

Uh oh!

targos commented Mar 13, 2026

Uh oh!

Renegade334 commented Mar 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Renegade334 commented Mar 13, 2026

Uh oh!

targos commented Mar 13, 2026

Uh oh!

Renegade334 commented Mar 13, 2026

Uh oh!

joyeecheung commented Mar 14, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

joyeecheung commented Mar 14, 2026

Uh oh!

StefanStojanovic commented Mar 16, 2026

Uh oh!

StefanStojanovic commented Mar 16, 2026

Uh oh!

StefanStojanovic commented Mar 17, 2026

Uh oh!

targos commented Mar 17, 2026

Uh oh!

targos commented Apr 3, 2026

Uh oh!

nodejs-github-bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Uh oh!

nodejs-github-bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Uh oh!

nodejs-github-bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Uh oh!

nodejs-github-bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Uh oh!

targos commented Apr 3, 2026

Uh oh!

nodejs-github-bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Uh oh!

nodejs-github-bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Uh oh!

nodejs-github-bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Uh oh!

nodejs-github-bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

14 participants

targos commented Feb 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Renegade334 commented Mar 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

joyeecheung commented Mar 14, 2026 •

edited

Loading